Cooking Without a Stove?

 

What is the number one problem for a college student living in a dorm? FOOD!!! We never know what we are going to eat or when. A few solutions have been implemented on campuses everywhere. One of those solutions is the addition of dinning halls that serve better food and more options. Another solution was the addition of more food places such as restaurants, fast food places, and markets to buy food and ingredients from. These solutions have helped students eat better in countless ways, but the biggest help was with the addition of kitchens into newer dorms. Now students can cook food in the kitchens and not be stuck with fast food or microwave everything. But what about students without kitchens in their halls?

That is where dorm room tips and tricks come into play. There are many ways that people have found to cook food without a kitchen. There is pasta in a coffee pot, hash browns in a waffle maker, and my personal favorite, grilled cheese sandwich made with an iron. This is a fast and simple trick to the perfect grilled cheese sandwich.

First, make your sandwich like normal; butter the bread and stack it with butter sides out and cheese in the middle. Then to keep it clean and sanitary, and for better cooking, wrap the assembled sandwich in tin foil. After your clothing iron has been heat up on the hottest setting, place the hot iron onto one side of the sandwich. After about 30 seconds, flip it over and repeat the last steps. When the next thirty seconds are done unwrap the sandwich and make sure it is done. You should end up with the perfect, crispy, golden outside and gooey, melted cheese inside.

Dorm room cooking hacks like this one are one way to use the old household tools that usually just sit in a closet somewhere. The tools I’m talking about are those that are associated with being a grown up. Most people get them because they need them once and all other grown ups have them so it must be a necessary thing. The truth is, irons are not very necessary any more. And, without the knowledge of the proper way to iron, which was lost almost in its entirety, there is almost no point in attempting to iron because your clothes still look funny, just wrinkle free.

Times are Changing

 

The movie Hairspray (2007) has many examples of popular culture representations of ironing as well as historical, cultural, and societal context. This musical is set in the 1960s and shows the culture of the time quite well. This was a time where there was a standard. This standard was set and only attainable by the upper-class and wealthier individuals. The standard was mostly based on looks, but even if you met these requirements, you could be denied social acceptance for many other, unrelated reasons.

In Hairspray the main character is a short, overweight, not wealthy, not upper-class teenage girl. The movie never states any information about her class standing or family income but there are many clues. It does not seem that this family is struggling to pay the bills but they certainly don’t have an abundance of money either. They are also not upper-class in their society which can be seen by the way they live their lives and the lack of acceptance by the social elite. The fact that the main character is also a teenager who appears to still be in high school adds a whole new dimension to the torture that is her life.

She is an outcast because she is different. That was the theme of the time: if you don’t fit the “norm” you don’t fit the society. This was a society built on looking young and pretty all the time as well as having money. If you met the standard of being skinny, pretty, and well dressed (and in the case of Hairspray, if you had nice hair) you were accepted by the dancers and makers of the popular dance show.

Tracy defied the norm and just by being a great dancer was invited to be on the show. This was her first step in change, next came integration. The musical takes place in a time when segregation was still prevalent. After a struggle and some time, integration was successful for this dance show. Like all popular musical and movies, it was a happy ending for all the good people while the bad ones were ruined.

While all of this seems great, it started with an outcast who was only left behind because she was different. Her mother was also different and because of that she was a social outcast as well. Edna was also overweight and because of it she never left the house for fear of running into someone who would be mean to her, as was common practice at the time. This led to her having the job of a laundress. She did other peoples’ laundry for money. This included ironing. Throughout the early parts of the musical she can be seen ironing clothes for other people quite frequently. However, as the movie progresses and she realizes that times have changed and people are now more accepting of other people, she leaves the house and is no longer seen ironing. This is one way the musical helped to show that housework was often left to those who could not find any better work due to the fact that they didn’t fit the social “norm” of the time.

Who Does the Work?

 

  • Hossain, Ziarat. “Division of Household Labor and Family Functioning in Off-Reservation Navajo Indian Families*.” Family Relations, vol. 50, no. 3, 2001, pp. 255–261., doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00255.x.

 

I put these two together because they are so similar. Both of these are studies that were published in different journals. Both studies look at gender roles as they relate to housework. The first article is a study that takes place in Australia. Chesters used surveys that were already taken from three different time periods and evaluated them. After analyzing the data she compared them over time. The results showed that women are doing more housework than men, but that women are doing less than they used to and men are doing more. This study helps to show that as culture slowly changes and shifts towards equality, the roles of the family members must, and are changing, too.

The second study takes a look at off-reservation Navajo Indian families. These families were all picked based on several factors such as age, marital status, and age and number of children. After each couple was surveyed the answers were evaluated and the results were compared. It was concluded that the women of the household do more in all four categories of housework. The categories the study used were cleaning, child-related, food-related, and maintenance.

When the results of the two studies are compared it is clear that, not just in one culture or society but in multiple, the women are doing significantly more housework than the men. This is further proof of the gender roles and gender gaps associated with housework that many people never realize or recognize. One explanation for these gender gaps was given by Chesters. She explains that these different chores have been associated with certain genders for so long that women feel feminine when they clean and men feel masculine when they fix cars. These ideals were not taught, but they were learned. These ideals were learned by kids watching their parents and by hearing and seeing the society they grew up in. It is a result of our culture that should be addressed and changed. No longer should cleaning, cooking, and childcare be unconscious symbols of femininity. No more should fixing cars and earning money for the family be inert signs of masculinity. We need to change our culture to teach the generations yet to come that there is no chores for specific genders. If it interests you, or if it needs to be done, do it. Don’t wait around for someone else to do it because it isn’t feminine or it isn’t masculine.

*Slight tangent related to the ideas these studies explore…*

Today at work the unconscious nature of these gender roles was seen. No one else seemed to notice that the girls were stuck with a job that involved cleaning while the guys were given a job that involved a little bit of strength. Today eight people were working to tear down after the concert in the CUB. There were six boys and two girls. At one point most of the group work was done and the actual work was beginning. Both girls were given the job of scrapping gum and other unknown, dirt covered, sticky substances off the floor. It made sense that I was given this job because I had nothing else to do and was the only one around when this job needed to be done. Later though, everyone else came back and the only other girl was told to help me. There were men around as well but they were told to help with the stage. This task required some strength but no more than I have. It is done as a team as well which makes it even easier to do. It was not seen as anything that would promote the gender roles associated with cleaning, but that is why it is so hard to change. These gender roles were not taught to us, they were just ingrained into our brains and we don’t even realize that they still exist.

Stage 3 Mini-Essay

The use of irons helped to create a society and culture centered on appearance and hardworking women. The use of irons allowed for clothes to become wrinkle free and have nice, fancy folds –called pleats- in them. Iron sin one form or another have been around for thousands of years but were never really easy to use until the modern electric iron was created. Before the electric iron, it took hours to iron everything. Things had to be heat up with fires or steam, extra cloth had to be used to keep the items being ironed clean, the iron had to be heated and reheated.

Originally the pleasure of freshly ironed clothes was reserved for the wealthy –those who could pay for it- because the irons were heavy and hard to use. That meant that the wealthy people could afford to pay some poor person to iron their clothes for them. That is just one more chore that rich children never learned to do. In the animated short film My Grandmother Ironed the King’s Shirts, it is said that the king and his wife, both wealthy people from birth, never learned how to iron. They were hopeless without the narrator’s grandma.

Then, through innovations and improvements to the technology, the clothing iron became more accessible to individual households. The iron was now easier to use; it was lighter and could even hold the heat source so it no longer had to be reheated and an extra cloth was no longer necessary. Ironing was more common and everyone could do it, but ironing alone used so much of the day -as if laundry wasn’t bad enough before. So then whose job should the ironing be? Obviously, whoever already did the laundry should also have to spend more time getting rid of the wrinkles from the clothes, sheets, and towels. That meant that the wealthy people still didn’t iron their own clothes and the poorer people still had to iron everyone’s clothes, not just their own. The passing off of mundane tasks started with domestic slaves who worked in their master’s house doing the cooking, cleaning, laundry, etc., but, when slaves were no longer legal, the job fell to underpaid maids.

The lives of these maids can be clearly seen in the movie The Help. At the time in which the movie takes place slaves were no longer allowed but there was still segregation and “separate but equal” laws in place. The movie also takes place in Jackson, Mississippi in the 1960s –a time when the top people of the south were still very anti-black and white supremacist. The Help shows the perspectives of the maids as well as the wealthy employers.

The slaves were all black or of another minority and were also all very poor. Working as a maid was their only way to feed their families. In the movie one of the maids even says she knew she was going to be a maid because her mother was a maid and her grandmother was a domestic slave; cleaning is in this family’s blood and it’s all they know. Many, if not all, had to drop out of high school to help make money for their families. That is another reason that these women could only have a job as a maid. They were uneducated and poor.

At work the maids were treated very poorly and were constantly doing housework. They cooked, cleaned, did laundry, polished silvery, set up for events, and cleaned up after events. These women never stopped working. They even raised their employer’s children for them.

The employers in The Help are all wealthy, upper class white couples. These couples look as nice as they can because they are in a culture and society that values wealth and appearance and the better your appearance the wealthier you look. These are the reasons that the men in these upper class couples are never around during the day. They go to work and attend the parties but they are not the typical “family man”. This is very clearly seen in the movie because they are rarely seen in the movie. The women in these couples are always around, talking to each other and planning parties or events. They do not take the time to raise their own children or do any housework and to these women and couples it is normal and okay to have no time for that stuff. The menial labor involved in the everyday housework is not seen as befitting of the wealthy women –and especially men- and they often never learn how to do any of the work themselves, not even cooking.

The Help shows a lot of cultural and societal context during the late 1950s and early 1960s. This movie shows the views of different social and economic classes as well as different racial groups regarding cleaning, laundry, and other housework and household tasks.

As the fight for equality continued and rights were won equality became a part of everything in life. Everything, including housework, became a part of everyone’s’ lives. This change led to everyone doing housework and everyone doing laundry. Of course the change was not complete so the majority of people that do the family’s laundry are the women but there are many households that even the men help with the task. A lot of people now don’t actually know how to iron things. I know I personally was never taught but none of the guys I know would ever go near an iron either. Many of us do not learn more than the basics needed to do laundry and with today’s technology that means hitting a few buttons and waiting.

There has clearly been a large shift in whose job it is to do these chores. This is due both to advancements in the actual technology as well as advancements in equality. The chore of ironing clothes has aided in the creation and perpetuation of gender roles and stereotypes for a long time but is now aiding in the abolishment of these gender roles.

Who Does the Ironing?

This post is about the movie The Help. This movie is based on a book with the same name. The Help takes place in the 1960’s and tells the tales of the time. The three main women are two black women working as maids in white families’ houses and a white women who is an aspiring writer.

At no point in this movie is ironing mentioned or done, but laundry in general is. The role of the maids in these houses was to do all the chores. This includes laundry, dishes, cooking, polishing silver, even raising the children for the white parents. While there is no obvious connection to ironing, The maids did do laundry and at the time the movie takes place, ironing was done. If every other chore was passed off the the underpaid, colored help, it would make sense to assume the ironing was as well. (Especially since ironing was part of laundry.)

The point of using this as a potential source is more to show the life and culture of the time -centered of course around the cleaning and laundry aspects- and to show different perspectives. During the 1960’s there were no more slaves but there was “hired help” for anyone who could afford it. The help consisted entirely of black men and women, especially the poorer ones. This was a job that paid very little and they had to follow every order of the family they worked for for fear of being fired and never finding a new family. Once the rumors were spread they would never be hired by another family in that town (Jackson, Mississippi) again. At one point in the movie Skeeter interviews Aibilene and asks her if she knew she was going to be a maid when she was growing up. Aibilene’s response is not surprising but that doesn’t make it any less sad. She says she did know because her mother was a maid and her grandmother was a domestic slave.

The three main women in the movie decide to show life in Jackson from the help’s point of view by writing a book full of their stories. These women get many other maids to tell their stories as well and eventually the book gets published. The different ideas presented between the maids’ stories and what is seen in the homes throughout the film allow the viewer to get a sense of both sides of the coin. At least two perspectives are seen about this way of life.

As said before, while this movie does not directly show ironing or even have an iron in the background, it allows the viewer to see the culture of the time including the aspects of cleaning and laundry.

Who Irons for the King?

 

I found this interesting video by searching “movies with ironing” on Google. A link for an IMDB page came up so I clicked on that. The story is a real bibliographic story of the person’s grandmother during World War II and is made as an animated short film.

The story takes place in Norway when they were looking for a new king. They found a new king but his wife and family had never learned to iron so they had to send their clothes out to be done for them. The narrator’s grandmother worked in a dry cleaning place during this time and one day discovered an emblem on the shirt she was ironing. She found out that she was ironing the kings shirts but then WWII happened and she had to iron the enemies’ clothes. She didn’t like this so she decided to sabotage their uniforms as her contribution to the war efforts. By the end of the war every cleaner was involved in the sabotaging of these enemy uniforms. The women were later awarded metals for their bravery as resistance fighters.

In this short film all the shirt pressers were female which is consistent with that time period. Around then (and sometimes now) it is viewed as the woman’s job to clean, which includes laundry. It was not a task that males usually helped with after adolescents.

The video also shows that wealthy (in this case royal) people didn’t do such menial labor. The royal family had to send their clothes to a place to have them pressed because they didn’t have servants in Norway at that time,according to the story in the video. The job of household tasks like cleaning and laundry were left to lower class and poorer people. At this time it was payed work, not just an obligatory job or slave labor, but the people who had this job didn’t get it because it was something they were passionate about, they got the job because it was something they could do well.

That certainly says something about our society and culture. The women working as the dry cleaners and shirt pressers (I still don’t understand if those are different) were all at least below the royal family, but realistically they were all lower class because anyone who could afford to pay money to avoid laundry wouldn’t want to get a job in laundry, let alone know how to do a job in laundry. So, as seen by this video, around this time it was a woman’s job to do anything related to housework and commercial laundry was a job for lower class, poorer women.

Could Your Iron Save Your Life?

“Ironing Kills Anthrax.” Snopes.com, 7 July 2016, http://www.snopes.com/rumors/iron.asp.

 

Originally I thought trying to find examples of my technology in a cultural context would be difficult because it it a background item; the clothes iron usually sits in a closet until someone has wrinkles. But as I started to think about it more, I realized that it shouldn’t be too difficult. An iron is a background thing but can be seen in movies and t.v. shows all the time if there is a woman doing laundry. (Always a woman from what I’ve seen… hint hint.)

I decided to first look on snopes.com and I found this article about whether or not anthrax spores can be killed by the heat of an iron. At first I was very confused and had no idea what anthrax was or why it was in the mail so I did some wikipedia searching (followed by more reliable sources to fact check wikipedia) and found out that anthrax is a spore creating bacterium that is very resilient. At this point I understood why everyone would be scared of it but still didn’t know why it was in the mail. I did more searching in the same manner as before and found information about the anthrax attacks in 2001. I found out that these attacks involved letters sent to important people that had anthrax spores concealed in them. These letters killed some people and infected some others. Now I understood why it was in the mail and why everyone was scared to open their letters.

Now that I had a little context I read the rest of the article. It was about how it might be possible to kill anthrax spores by ironing your mail. This was stated as false by snopes.com and they cited a source as saying anthrax can only be killed by sunlight. But what does this have to do with culture?

Well first of all it shows that there should be at least one iron in every home. The point of using an iron was that it was a common, easy to use household tool that could be used to potentially kill harmful bacteria. (The other suggestion was the less efficient microwave.) So What does that say about us? That shows that even in 2001 the average family had at least one iron and implying that we were still very concerned with our everyday appearance.  But what about the poorer families that couldn’t afford a microwave or an iron? Those two tools were so common by 2001 that if you didn’t have one you obviously knew at least one person who did.

Stage 2 Mini-Essay

The life cycle of a clothes iron starts with the gathering of raw materials (mining of and processing of metal and creation of plastics) and ends sitting in the ground forever. I didn’t find much on the very first part of this cycle -which is more of a line- but I will before I write the final essay. (This is just already late so I needed to get it done with what I already had so I can start the next stage.) So, we will start after the materials are collected.

That means we are starting in the factory. The factory is where the materials are put together into the item that is to be sold and used in many households worldwide: the clothes iron. To find out more about this process I found a How It’s Made episode that shows what happens in the factory. It starts with the sole plate, the metal part, being put together. This involves ceramic being squirted into the bottom metal piece. The job of this ceramic is to break up the water surface to help facilitate steaming. The sole plate is then finished by the top of it being riveted on and the rivets being covered in silicone. The sole plate is commonly made of stainless steel now.

The plastic part is created in two pieces and both start with liquid plastic being squirted into a mold and cooled. The extra bits left behind from this are snipped off and the insides of the clothes iron are put in place, including a heat sensor and an on off switch. then the top and bottom of the plastic part are glued together with hot glue and a worker puts the sole plate and plastic part together. Another worker adds the power cord and a third worker inspects it and puts the product on the path to packaging.

These factories can make an iron in about ten minutes with the combined efforts of robots and humans.But what happens when the products leave the factory? Their next stop is stores where they are bought by people and used until they break. When anything breaks nowadays it is vey common to just throw it away and condemn it to spend the rest of its days in a landfill. That is what happens to irons. They are discarded and dumped in landfills whee they will remain forever because they do not break down.

Figure 1.3 in Recycling and the Politics of Urban Waste shows that plastic makes up eight per cent and metal also makes up eight per cent of household waste. According to chapter 5 of Waste Management: Towards a sustainable society, The Landfill Problem, “Nearly 90 per cent of of the refuse and solid waste is still buried in the United States….”(Kharbana and Stallworthy 49). So, what is the solution to too full landfills? Make more! That has been the solution for a while; once a landfill can’t hold anymore just cover it up with dirt and move to a new location.

“Why not try something new?” you might ask. Well we have; it’s called recycling. The author of Recycling and he Politics of Urban Waste, Matthew Gandy, says “A consideration of the economic aspects of the promotion of recycling is imporant because a key reason for the promotion of recycling is frequently argued to be the potential of schemes to generate a profit from the sales of materials and the creation of savings in waste disposal”(33). If this is the case and recycling is more profitable than the current system of waste disposal, not to mention the environmental benefits of it, then why isn’t everything recycled instead of just thrown away? For the simple fact that somethings can’t be recycled, just like some things just aren’t biodegradable. Also things made from more than one material, such as irons (metal and plastic), would need to be taken apart before being recycles.

So for now, until the day that everything can be recycled, we will have to stick to sending irons to spend eternity buried in the ground.

Inside the Factory

 

Unfortunately I haven’t been able to find anything about the type of plastic used to make a clothes iron. However, I was able to find the type of metal that is typically used to make the sole plate now. Most, if not all, iron sole plates are now made with stainless steel.

This post is actually about a video I found about how irons are assembled. While trying to find the type of plastic to see whether or not it could be recycled, I remembered watch How It’s Made when I was younger. I was always really fascinated by this show which gives an up close look at the factory production process and machines used to create certain items. I decided to just google if they had an episode where they talked about making an iron. The internet Gods graced me with a 5 minutes clip of an episode of How It’s Made where they talk about the production of steam irons.

In these five minutes I learned that an iron is made in parts and then assembled little bits at a time. It starts with the sole plate being assembled and the plastic part of the iron being assembled in two pieces: the upper and the lower. The sole plate is assembles by ceramic being squirted into the metal casing that is the sole plate. The ceramic helps to break up the water that creates the steam. The top and bottom of the sole plate are then riveted together and the rivets are covered in silicone to keep them in place.

The plastic parts start with plastic (unspecified type) being squirted into a mold. The pieces are then put in place and unwanted parts of plastic are snipped off. The upper gets glued onto the lower with some hot glue. Eventually a person puts the plastic piece on top of the metal sole plate and adds the electric chord. A person then inspects the final product and if it passes the steam iron is packaged and sent out to stores.

The factory utilizes both robots and people to create a steam iron. With their process the steam iron is put together in ten minutes. At that rate it seems that more irons are made than are needed because that is just one factory in one country on this planet. What happens to all these irons if they aren’t sold? My guess: they get packed up when the newer models come in and they get sent into storage or thrown away.

How About Recycling That Old Iron?

Gandy, Matthew. Recycling and the Politics of Urban Waste. St. Martin’s Press, 1994.

 

As was discussed in my previous post, most, if not all, clothes irons are just sent away to spend the rest of eternity in a landfill. But what would happen if an iron could be, and was, entirely recycled. Not just some part but the whole thing. This book, Recycling and the Politics of Urban Waste, talks about recycling and focuses on the municipal waste side of things.

Chapter one starts by saying, “Municipal waste accounts for only a relatively small fraction of total global waste production, the main sources being from agriculture, industry and mining.” While this may be true, have you ever seen a landfill? Even with just household waste a landfill can fill up pretty fast. And what’s even worse is that a lot of that trash will never actually go away. Even if all the trash in landfills did decompose we create trash at a rate much higher than the rate of decomposition. So what’s the solution to this problem? Recycling.

I still have not looked into the exact types of the resources used to make a common household clothes iron so for now we will assume the entire thing is recyclable. What would happen if that were true -and maybe one day it will be true. The fact still remains that to recycle a clothes iron it must first be dismantled (the plastic and metal must be sorted). Then they will go to separate places and go through separate processes to be turned into a new product. Let’s start with the plastic.

I found information about one process that can be used to recycle plastic. This process starts with shredding and washing the plastic. The plastic then goes through intense pressure that makes the plastic mixture moldable. The final product is a molded piece of plastic. This plastic has even been used for fence posts. The benefits of this recycled plastic include the fact that it is water resistant, won’t rot, won’t be eaten by bugs… basically it is indestructible to nature.

Now for the metal. It goes through a similar start where it is shredded and washed. Then it gets melted down and is used to create things like cans. The process of recycling metal is more energy efficient than the process of creating something with virgin metals. Recycling also creates less pollution and waste than the initial production.

The benefits of recycling are definitely very great so why isn’t everything recyclable? The answer to that question goes back to the people creating the products. It is cheaper to use certain materials and some are stronger than others. Unless very large changes are made, recycling is still not going to reach its full potential.